redefining kitchen accessibility

Adaptable Kitchen: Co-design

ROLE

UX Designer & Researcher

UX Designer & Researcher

UX Designer & Researcher

focus

Inclusive Design

Inclusive Design

Inclusive Design

timeline

3 Months

3 Months

3 Months

Project background

I served as the UX Design Lead for a team that designed an adaptable kitchen for an organization called the Adaptable House Project. This organization was founded by a health & wellness instructor with Multiple Sclerosis to promote independence and quality of life for individuals with chronic disabilities.

Purpose

The goal was to design an elegant and functional kitchen that adapts to the needs of users with diverse abilities, promoting their well-being.

Research

Building on insights from the Adaptable House Project, we focused on the kitchen, exploring the unique challenges and design considerations required for creating functional, aesthetically pleasing spaces for individuals with physical disabilities.

Goals

Goals

Understand User Needs

Explore the challenges faced by individuals with physical disabilities in the kitchen.

Assess Current Products

Analyze the strengths and weaknesses of existing adaptable kitchen solutions.

Learn From Approaches

Review different methods used to create adaptable products.

Identify Design Considerations

Determine critical design elements for adaptable kitchen solutions.

Assumptions

Assumptions

Functionality is Key

Users prioritize practical functionality over aesthetics in adaptive kitchen designs.

Mobility Assistance is Crucial

Effective mobility support is essential for the usability of adaptive kitchen products.

Product Gaps Exist

There is a shortage of adaptable kitchen products that meet user needs while also being aesthetically pleasing.

Methodologies

Methodologies

Our research and design process combined thorough secondary research with co-design sessions, ensuring user-centered solutions that balance functionality and aesthetics.

Literature Review

Conducted an in-depth review of existing research on adaptable housing and kitchen design to understand current approaches and identify design considerations.

User Interviews

Collaborated with individuals with physical disabilities to understand their needs and pain points.

Affinity Mapping

Used FigJam to create an affinity map, organizing findings to highlight key interests and concerns, and define design requirements.

Participatory Design Sessions

Conducted collaborative brainstorming and co-design session using reverse assumptions to challenge existing ideas and ideate on new possibilities.

Concept Testing

Obtained feedback on the design concepts for the adaptable kitchen from relevant users.

Insights

Secondary research combined with user interviews helped us learn about the variability in individuals' mobilities and recognize the importance of adaptability in the solution. The key insights from research include:

Insight 1

The physical abilities for most of these individuals vary through the day.

Insight 2

The daily fluctuations in their abilities can be categorized into three key stages: Resting, Stability, and Mobility.

Insight 3

Users need support with comfort, stability, and enhanced mobility to navigate through the three stages in their abilities.

Insight 4

Design aesthetics are as important as functionality to these users who do not want a product that constantly reminds them of their limitations.

Co-design session: Interactive Figjam board after preliminary design
Co-design session: Interactive Figjam board after preliminary design
Co-design session: Interactive Figjam board after preliminary design

Co-design session: Interactive Figjam board

Key Features

Key Features

Key Features

The key features identified through the co-design sessions and literature review were used to inform the design of the adaptable kitchen. The following design features were prioritized: ​​​​​​​​​​​​​​

Co-design session: Interactive Figjam board after preliminary design
Co-design session: Interactive Figjam board after preliminary design
Co-design session: Interactive Figjam board after preliminary design
Co-design session: Interactive Figjam board after preliminary design

Design

Concept testing led to key design changes: a stool leg-rest for added leg support, a collapsible handrail for mobility support, and a voice- or button-operated touchscreen remote in the armrest for better accessibility than a joystick.

With the assistance of an AI rendering tool, I created a higher fidelity mock-up of our design.

Final Prototype

Using the insights from our design review, we created a revised sketch.

Reflection

Takeaways

Takeaways

Collaborative Learning

Working closely with users, especially through co-design sessions, allowed us to gather real-time feedback that shaped our design direction.

Resource Limitations

Without funding or a partner to build a prototype, we faced difficulties testing and validating ideas in a tangible way, which limited our ability to gauge their real-world impact.

Universal Design Principle

Designing with accessibility in mind benefits not only people with disabilities but everyone.

Next Steps

Next Steps

Broader User Involvement

Involve a more diverse group of people with different disabilities to gain deeper insights into their needs and preferences.

Prototype Development

Secure funding and partnerships to build a working prototype for actual testing and real-world validation.

Product Gaps Exist

There is a shortage of adaptable kitchen products that meet user needs while also being aesthetically pleasing.